Aaron Sorkin Q&A at the BFI

Tonight (Jan 20) I went to see Aaron Sorkin speaking at the BFI about his screenplay for The Social Network. The film screened before Sorkin came on stage to be interviewed by Francine Stock and take questions from the audience. I scribbled some very rough notes from the 45 minute presentation, which went something like this:

The screenplay was based on 14pp book proposal. Random House wanted to release the movie and book and the same time so producer Scott Rudin hired Sorkin to write the script before the book had been finished – 'simultaneous development' was the term. Sorkin based his screenplay on three sources: Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg's original blogs (the 'Erica Albright' character is a real person but with the name changed); legal documents from the lawsuits which Sorkin went through with two lawyers; and interviews conducted on the basis of strict anonymity. Sorkin noted that the fact that they knew that Zuckerberg was drinking beer and which brand on the night he coded Facemash – there were were only four other people present at the time – indicates the accuracy of their sources.

Sorkin enjoyed the contradictions of two lawsuits and three conflicting versions of the truth because he likes courtroom drama and Rashomon. He researched facts and invented the characters' motivations. He was interested in the world of clever, angry young men who view women as either prizes or enemies, describing the protagonists' psyche as 'middle school.'

Talked a lot about the first scene of the movie. Sorkin loved that it's a scene you have to 'lean in to listen to... If you don't land the audience with the first scene there's no point in writing the scenes that follow.' Sorkin wanted to treat the audience as being as intelligent as the filmmakers, and not talk down to them. His pairing with director David Fincher was 'counter-intuitive' as Fincher is visual and Sorkin writes 'people talking in rooms' but Fincher understood that this film was a 'story told through language' and the multiple takes of scenes were so the actors could talk faster and 'casualise' the dialogue. Sorkin credited Sony and Fincher with understanding this dense first scene. Fincher filmed Sorkin's 'scenes of typing as if they were bank robberies.'

First draft was the shooting script. Fincher came on board on the condition that the script wasn't 'noted to death.' The real-life Eduardo Saverin went to ground during production and could not be contacted by anyone because his legal settlement was on condition of non-disclosure. Sorkin guessed that Saverin was paid hundreds of millions plus stock and would have lost it all if he broke the agreement. Eduardo did see the finished film at a specially arranged private screening at Sony's NY preview theater. Sorkin joked that when Eduardo emerged from the screening you probably could have performed surgery on him without anaesthetic.

The Winklevoss twins have seen the movie many times. (Laughter from the audience.) Zuckerberg closed the Facebook office for the day and bought out a theater so all the staff could see the movie; Sorkin credited Zuckerberg with being 'a good sport' about it.

Sorkin's research assistant is a UCLA computer researcher and helped him with the tech speak. Sorkin said hacking scenes and intern-off are two scenes he doesn't understand it all: he wrote it based on notes and many other people checked it. 'I had no idea what I was writing.'

In the early stages of development producer Scott Rudin made 'an aggressive attempt' to get Zuckerberg to participate but Zuckerberg declined. Sorkin was relieved when Zuckerberg passed because he didn't want the movie to be 'a Facebook production' or 'an infomercial.' 'Once you meet a person it's difficult to be anything but nice to them.' Sorkin was not out to 'get' Zuckerberg; he portrayed him as an antihero and identified with the fictionalised character as an outsider.

Sorkin said that although nothing ever goes right in showbiz, this project did. Scott Rudin is a great producer because he's nice to people. He gave Sorkin no instructions except to 'write the movie you want to write.' Sorkin did months of research, thinking. He drives around when he doesn't have an idea. Finally hooked on the idea of Zuckerberg's blog post as the start of the movie, flicking back and forth between the character's desire for revenge and the glamorous party to which he would never gain admittance. Wrote first 18-20pp scene in a day or two and sent the pages to Rudin; Rudin said you've got it. Finished the screenplay on a Wednesday (160pp odd, he and Fincher timed it with a stopwatch to reassure Sony that it would come in at two hours); sent it to Sony on a Thursday who then forwarded it to the only director they wanted, which was Fincher.

Sorkin said writing is always a compromise between the author's personal view and fidelity to the characters. He also said he was very aware that he was writing about young people who were already suing each other. Joked that 'if your moral compass is broken there's always Sony's legal department,' which went over every inch of the screenplay. Sorkin said that had he written anything that was both untrue and defamatory 'then Zuckerberg would own Sony by now.'

*

Sorkin has already spoken about writing the film. Earlier I wrote about the movie and about Sorkin's early TV series Sports Night.

Random

The mystery novel must punish the criminal in one way or another, not necessarily by operation of the law courts. Contrary to popular belief, this has nothing to do with morality. It is part of the logic of the form. Without this the story is like an unresolved chord in music. It leaves a sense of irritation.
– Raymond Chandler, 'Casual Notes on the Mystery Novel' (1949) Raymond Chandler Speaking

In our everyday life we are usually trying to do something, trying to change something into something else, or trying to attain something. Just this trying is already in itself an expression of our true nature.
– Shunryu Suzuki, Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind

Yesterday

Patton Oswalt on why geek culture must die:
When everyone has easy access to their favorite diversions and every diversion comes with a rabbit hole's worth of extra features and deleted scenes and hidden hacks to tumble down and never emerge from, then we're all just adding to an ever-swelling, soon-to-erupt volcano of trivia, re-contextualized and forever rebooted. We're on the brink of Etewaf: Everything That Ever Was—Available Forever.

I know it sounds great, but there's a danger: Everything we have today that's cool comes from someone wanting more of something they loved in the past.
It's an interesting article. I think we're going to run out of cultural references before we run out of oil.

Ray guns are not just the future

Finally Wikileaks says the words I've been waiting for: secret war against UFOs.
A new report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared for President Medvedev by Russian Space Forces (VKS) 45th Division of Space Control says that an upcoming WikiLeaks release of secret US cables details that the Americans have been "engaged" since 2004 in a "war" against UFO's based on or near the Continent of Antarctica, particularly the Southern Ocean.

According to this report, the United States went to its highest alert level on June 10, 2004 after a massive fleet of UFO's "suddenly emerged" from the Southern Ocean and approached Guadalajara, Mexico barely 1,600 kilometers (1,000 miles) from the American border. Prior to reaching the US border, however, this massive UFO fleet is said in this report to have "dimensionally returned" to their Southern Ocean "home base".
This reported report also implies that the Russians have a 'Space Force' and at least 45 'Space Control Divisions'. More completely, scientifically true and probably real no really honest omg details here.

Pardon my French

New review of The Church of John Coltrane at www.lecture-ecriture.com:
Un peu de fumée bleue, quelques notes de musique...

Robert Marling vient de boire le bouillon dans les grandes largeurs – à dire vrai, ce n’est pas la première fois qu’il se fait ainsi plumer au poker -, lorsqu’il apprend la mort de son père, dont la vie l’avait éloigné. Et ce n’est là que le début de... de quoi, au juste?

D’une redécouverte d’un père par son fils, assurément. Alors que Robert liquide tout ce qu’il possède, sa maison, sa voiture, son travail d’architecte, pour venir s’installer dans la petite chambre que son père louait dans un immeuble désaffecté, ou presque, dans un quartier d’Auckland en pleine réhabilitation (comprenez que la spéculation immobilière y fait rage). Dans ce recoin perdu comme hors du monde, mais que les remous du monde atteignent pourtant encore, à peine assourdis, Robert redécouvre la passion de son père pour le jazz, une passion qui l’avait conduit à rassembler "la plus belle collection de disques de jazz de l’hémisphère Sud" (p. 48), et à accumuler une masse invraisemblable de notes en prévision d’un livre - "L’église de John Coltrane" – qu’il n’écrirait jamais: des notes en quantité sur John Coltrane, bien sûr, mais aussi Miles Davis, ou encore Li Jin, une chanteuse de jazz chinoise qui connut son heure de gloire dans l’entre-deux-guerres.

C’est le début d’un cheminement dont on ne sait, en définitive, s’il doit conduire Robert à se perdre ou à se retrouver alors que le hasard tisse sa toile autour de lui, au fil des coïncidences les plus improbables et des rencontres les plus étonnantes: un juriste spécialiste des litiges successoraux et adepte du Sumi-e (ou calligraphie zen), un expert en assurances philosophe, une punkette cachant au fond sous ses piquants une encore très petite fille, un jeune chinois chanceux au jeu mais qui a bien des choses à cacher, et last but not least, une galeriste à la séduction vénéneuse. C’est pour Robert le début d’une errance dans un décor presque irréel – ce quartier pour ainsi dire abandonné et dans l’attente d’une renaissance, proche de la gare d’Auckland -, balancé entre l'effervescence irrationnelle des marchés – marchés de l'art ou immobilier - et la liberté créatrice si intensément vivante qu'incarnait John Coltrane. Une errance dont le lecteur ne conservera, une fois tournée la dernière page, pour seules traces évanescentes qu'un peu de fumée bleue, quelques notes de musique...

Iggy

Later With Jools Holland interview 2010.

Eddie

Edward James Olmos interviewed here:
If your possible careers included only baseball and acting, you really rolled those dice.

[Laughs.] Amen. I did not create any sort of backup plan. But one thing I learned at a very young age is not to try and live outside my means. I don't let possessions own me. I think the only payment I have is my house. I don't have car payments or credit cards. I'm not a rich guy — I could have been very rich or much more famous had I done all the work I was offered. I just couldn't do it. I'm not that gifted to be able to do stuff I don't have passion for.